The Commission of Experts’ first interim report of 9 February 1993 concluded that the establishment of an ad hoc international tribunal to try the perpetrators of atrocities in the former Yugoslavia “would be consistent with the direction of its work”. Notable in this respect were resolutions 764 (1992) of 13 July 1992 and 771 (1992) of 13 August 1992. A number of Security Council resolutions adopted in the course of 1992 had already affirmed the principle of individual responsibility for crimes under international law. The article concludes with a discussion of the inherent conflict between the tribunal’s mission to prosecute violations of international humanitarian law and the objective of many transitional regimes to delay such prosecutions in order to bolster their political standing vis-a-vis domestic opponents.On 6 October 1992, amid accounts of widespread violations of international humanitarian law and fundamental human rights in the conflicts engulfing the former Yugoslavia, the Security Council passed resolution 780 (1992), calling on the Secretary-General to establish an impartial Commission of Experts to provide conclusions on these accounts. Next, the domestic politics of cooperation is examined through narratives of the government’s response to several controversial war crimes indictments: the Mirko Norac indictment in early 2001 the Ante Gotovina and Rahim Ademi indictments in mid-2001, and the Janko Bobetko indictment in the fall of 2002. It then evaluates cooperation with the ICTY during the first year of the reformist government of Ivica Racan. This is followed by an assessment of Croatia’s cooperation with the ICTY under the authoritarian regime of Franjo Tudjman, which ruled the country from 1990 through 1999. It then places the Croatian government’s dilemma concerning cooperation with the tribunal in the larger context of the experience of newly democratizing countries that confronted the question of transitional justice in the 1980s and the early 1990s. This article begins with a discussion of the tribunal’s mandate and its limited power to compel state cooperation. The result has been an inconsistent, ad hoc policy that has quickly transformed the aftermath of each tribunal indictment of a Croatian general into a political crisis that threatens to undermine stability and the country’s nascent democratization process. The Croatian government is caught between the competing pressures of nationalists who oppose cooperation and members of the international community who have conditioned Croatia’s entry into Western organizations upon increased cooperation with the ICTY. The politics of cooperation reach beyond the domestic arena and also involve an interaction with ICTY officials, international institutions, and foreign governments. International criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia how to#The strong domestic resistance to cooperation in the Balkans underscores the challenge confronting both the ad hoc tribunals as well as the permanent International Criminal Court: how to institutionalize a system of international tribunals in which neither the winners nor losers are immune from standing trial for atrocities committed during battle.Īlthough the international criminal tribunals prosecute individuals and not nations, nationalist groups in Croatia have raised the political costs of cooperation with the ICTY through rhetoric that equates the tribunal’s indictments against Croatian individuals with an attack against the dignity and legitimacy of the Homeland War (1991-1995) and against the legitimacy of Croatia as a nation. The issue of cooperation-and the challenges it poses to stability and democratization in the former Yugoslavia and to the ICTY’s struggle for institutional survival-will continue to be volatile as long as the tribunal exists. The factors that have made the issue of cooperation so volatile in Croatia are addressed, shedding light on domestic politics of state cooperation with the ICTY. This article examines Croatia’s involvement with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |